Evaluation form.

Instructions:

   Be constructive and fair in your evaluation of your peers' projects.
   Your feedback will be distributed to the author(s) of the projects you
   are reviewing.

   Your review will be judged as well and is part of the graded course
   work.



Paper Evaluation Criteria and Specific Recommendations

  Scores:
  6:    Strong Accept
  5:    Accept
  4:    Weak Accept
  3:    Weak Reject
  2:    Reject
  1:    Strong Reject


Rate with one of the scores above:

  Originality (For us: Does the report clearly identify what the project group
               has accomplished ? Is it clear what ideas have been taken from
               the literature and what are the ideas of the project group ? Note,
               a good project/report must not make an original scientific contribution,
               but is should clearly say which idea originates where.)
                                        
  Importance and practical impact of the work
                                        
  Clarity and technical quality
                                        
  Paper organization and presentation
                                        
  Overall rating
                                        


  Your Confidence in review:
    high
    moderate
    low

  Detailed comments to the author(s):

   Here, you may start with a short summary of the paper's gist.
   Say what you think are good and strong points, then point out
   what you found week or wrong. Be CONSTRUCTIVE !

   Are there any errors in the logic, in the reasoning, in the motivation ?

   You may also indicate typos, however, the emphasize should clearly be on
   the above points.


  A summary of the rationale for your recommendation:

   Provide a detailed account of your above judgement, i.e., your rating.
   You should argue why you decided for which score/rating.






------------------------------------------------------------